Archives for category: Activism

I suppose this is an entry that is long overdo. Despite the fact that I am now on the beach in Vietnam, have traversed several countries by train in the last few weeks, and am geographically veryveryvery far away from the windswept, bone-chilling sandstorms of the Mongolian spring, I am still writing about this country. ;)

Before I get started, I wanted to explicitely state my intentions in writing this article: to point to the dangers, from a feminist woman’s perspective, of feeding the fires of extreme nationalism and/or ethnic blood superiority rhetoric. I by no means want to say that all Mongolians think this way; I am simply saying that these tendencies exist in contemporary Mongolian culture and why I perceive them to be limiting and dangerous. There are all types of people in Mongolia, just like everywhere else!

The reason I have been brooding over this particular issue recently – the issue of racism towards the Chinese, Mongolian nationalism and patriarchy- is an incident I experienced recently while in Beijing:

A few days after leaving Mongolia by train (and internally coping with the feeling of loss that came with it), I was trying to get back to my hostel after going to a bar late at night on the other end of town (and Beijing is a big town!). Unbeknownst to me, the trains stop around 11, so I ended up with a friend on the side of a freeway trying to flag down a cab. We weren’t alone; several others had also been ousted by the train schedule and were trying to get home.

I guess living in Asia has made me pretty good at recognizing face structures, cause I can now pretty much pick a Mongolian out of a crowd. And down the line a few meters from me was a man speaking English and not Chinese like the rest. I knew immediately that he was Mongolian and walked up to him to ask where he was going and if he wanted to share a cab.

“Ta Mongol hun uu?” I asked and the look on his face was priceless. Guess it wasn’t everyday that a white woman walked up to him and spoke Mongolian. We exchanged basic pleasantries and introductions, but that was all ruined by the following:

While my Mongolian counterpart hadn’t been looking, a cab had pulled up next to us. But, instead of waiting, a Chinese man who had been standing nearby got in the cab. In my mind, there is nothing wrong with this, since we had been talking and distracted. But once the Mongolian man noticed, he lost it:

“Get out you stupid fag***!” he yelled in English. “You stupid Chinese f***,” I am the blood of Genghis Khan, not like you you stupid, weak Chinese!”

He was flipping out. The Chinese dude in the car and the man standing next to me were screaming at each other. The Mongolian man kept yelling about him having the blood of the great, strong Genghis Khan, in contrast to his weak, ‘infertile’ Chinese counterpart. The man in the cab flicked the Mongolian off and sped away.

During this exchange a different cab pulled up. My friend and I quickly jumped in and left the racist Mongolian man behind still no better off than he had been 10 minutes beforehand…

But the entire thing left a very sour taste in my mouth. What a statement this Mongolian man is making about Mongolian culture while being in a foreign country! What an exchange laced with blood-based, fertility-laden allegories of national superiority.. yuck! If you hate China so much, why are you even IN China?

I had to write about it.

***

Sinophobia, or racism and/or hatred of Chinese culture and ethnicity, resonates very strongly with many Mongolians.  While traveling through the countryside during research (initially) on nutrition, herders would repeatedly tell me that they don’t trust fruit, because all fruit is from China and thus poisoned.  When I first came to Mongolia six years ago, gangs of orphans used to roam the streets of UB and accost travelers for money.  These gangs are conspicuously absent now with many people claiming that these kids have been taken by the Chinese and shipped off into the Chinese organ trade.  And, obviously due to the Chinese government’s usurpation tendencies, Mongolians fear that the Chinese propaganda machine will eventually turn its gaze to the wide and (mostly empty) Mongolian steppe.

This deep-seated dislike towards the Chinese did not solely arise on its own.  Rhetoric propagated by the Soviet Union in attempts to keep the Mongol nation from getting stronger played a large role in defining what contemporary Mongolians conceive as as “Mongolian.”  As I read in this article recently:

“In the first years of the existence of the [Mongolian] nation (note: which was founded in 1921), Mongols expressed a strong desire to create a Greater Mongolia that would include ethnically Mongolian regions of both China and Russia (Inner Mongolia and Buryatia respectively). The Russians were wary of the emergence of such a large political entity and they appealed to various tactics to create distance between the Mongols of the Republic of Mongolia and other Mongolian groups. As a result of these policies Mongolianness has come to take on a very narrow interpretation… Throughout the Socialist period, the notion of Chinese threat was routinely mobilised by the Russians for political reasons.”

So, although fears of economic dependence on China maybe legitimate and have a historical basis (I mean what country is NOT dependent on China?), many of these rumors are dramatized to serve a different purpose.  I asked the Mongolian National Nutrition Center about the fruit fears, which did chemical tests on Mongolian fruit and found out that the rumor regarding the poor quality of Chinese fruit entering Mongolia is simply not true.  It’s just an excuse to not eat fruit, but it proves a valuable point behind a lot of the stories and rumors circulating about the Chinese in Mongolian popular culture.  Hatred of the Chinese has proven to be a very good rallying cry to unite Mongolians in this unstable, increasingly globalizing world. Furthermore, it upholds ‘traditional’ patriarchal Mongolian culture at a time when women are questioning the traditional gender divide, and has led to the growing sympathy behind and rise of Mongolian ultra-nationalist groups like Dayar Mongol (whose flag prominently features a giant swastika), Blue Mongol and White Swastika.

Thus, it was super interesting to get into multiple conversations with the Chinese I encountered on my travels regarding Mongolia.  The Chinese citizens I talked to knew virtually nothing about their northern neighbor, except for one line in the official history book that stated that Mongolia used to be part of China. Considering how much time Mongolians spend talking about China it is odd to hear how little the Chinese think about them.

Woman = Womb, Man = Mongolianness

Mongolian nationalism plays upon already hyper-masculine Mongolian cultural tendencies and is especially appealing to young Mongolian men.

Setting politics aside for anthropology, if you look at any patrilineal society – a society in which a woman joins the man’s household upon marriage and inheritance is conveyed through the male’s family – a woman’s prime function becomes the continuation of the male bloodline.  Reproduction of male heirs is elevated and becomes a woman’s raison d’être in order to continue the male lineage. Thus, the preference in many societies for male children.

A Western vestigial of this patrilineal inheritance is the acquisition of the husband’s name upon marriage (which obviously still exists). In Mongolia, children get their father’s first name, which is then put before their own name… but the meaning is the same. According to ultra-nationalist rhetoric, you are your father’s child. You are of his blood. Your mother was just the carrier.

I also carried the weight of this distinction when I tried to define myself as half-American, half-German to Mongolians using the Mongolian word эрлийз (“erliiz”).  ’Erliiz’ refers to mixed-heritage children and could be translated as half-blood, which doesn’t sound so nice in whatever language you translate it into (i.e. Mongolian women calling me ‘Mischling’ while speaking to me in German).  The question that initially shocked me and subsequently irritated me was when I would be asked, after proclaiming my ‘erliiz’-ness, where my father came from.  I came to realize that my mother’s lineage was of secondary importance, and that my heritage was mostly defined through my father, something that irritated me and made me feel like my right to define my own identity (and those of any hypothetical children of mine) was being removed.

But this makes sense from a patrilineal and patriarchal societal standpoint.  Because lineage is passed down through the father’s line and children belong to that line the really only important ethnic marker of a child’s heritage is the father’s sperm.  And women become empty wombs without ethnic/national/identity markers.

A personal anecdote from my own life: The woman = womb, man = ethnicity standpoint is not new.  The reason my siblings, who are 20 years older than I am, do not have German citizenship is because of an antiquated German citizenship law that only allowed German heritage to be passed down through the father’s line.  Because my siblings only had a German mother – a non-ethnic ‘womb’ – they weren’t granted citizenship.  Just an example from Western culture of the same tendency, which points to being rooting in patrilineal/patriarchal nationalist societies that turn women into male heir, bloodline reproducers and remove their rights to their children (*cough*Nazis*cough*).  This law was revised in 1974.

The Extinction Myth

Mongolian Neo-Nazi Scenesters doing the Hitler Salute at a Metal Concert: One friend of mine who used to be in the scene told me that they just think it looks cool... at least that's why he used to do the Hitler greeting at concerts.

Nothing seems to unite contesting groups more than the idea of a joint enemy.  And China looms in the Mongolian cultural consciousness like a feral specter in the distance ready to pounce at the next available opportunity.  And this fear that China (and other foreigners) will one day take over and wipe the map clean of Mongolia has created a nationalist backlash.

I, myself, ended up at some pretty dodgy nationalist concerts while in Mongolia and I often felt unsafe.  However, my status as a white woman seemed to be less of a threat (although not completely safe, I am not an ethnic (sperm) driven threat to nationalist groups).  Thus, when the Mongolian man in Beijing was screaming at the taxi-caper culprit, he kept alluding to the superiority of his sperm, bloodline and thus strength, in comparison to the supposed weakness and infertility of the Chinese man.

I had the opportunity to see quite a few Dayar Mongol protests on Sukhbaatar Square at the end of last year.  The following statement from the organizations head, D. Gansuren, illustrates the extinction myth that feeds nationalist groups; the fear of loosing the bloodline and the need to defend the motherland against the evil invading foreigners:

“We should never forget that Mongolia was a powerful and great world empire. However, high ranking officials are corrupted and giving the land to the foreigners now. It should be mentioned that Mongolians are being beaten and yielded by foreigners who hire the Mongolians at lower wages. Let them do slave work in their own country. The ancestors of Mongolia did not sacrifice their lives to their enemy in order give the land to foreigners. That’s why I wish Mongolians would learn and have good examples from genius kings (referring to the Mongolian khans).  Also they should follow the slogans of the kings, regarded as superior for the Mongolian heritage. We wanted to reawaken nationalistic views to the public through protest. The swastika symbolizes peace, firm, forever and long life.” (an entry regarding the Mongolian meaning of the swastika is another post…)

My Body Belongs to… Genghis Khan?

A gender juxtaposition thus results from the sentiments of blood, ethnic and sperm-based superiority: If you are a in-group woman dating a foreign man, you are creating foreign children and thus a traitor. But an in-group man can date a foreign woman and have children without any repercussions.  The children that result from such a union have the sperm of the father and are thus of the in-group.

A French woman having her head shaved after sleeping with a German.

A Mongolian woman gets her head shaved by Dayar Mongol after sleeping with a Chinese man.

Resultingly, Dayar Mongol publically announced that any woman found sleeping with a Chinese man would have her head shaved (mimicking what the French did to young women who had slept with German soldiers during WWII and what Germans did with young women who had slept with non-Aryans).  Many of my foreign friends had to be super vigilant while walking around with a Mongolian-looking woman (didn’t matter if she was actually Mongolian), and most Caucasian men dating Mongolian women can’t go out in UB with their significant other for fears of getting beaten up.  However, I had no problem dating Mongolian men; in fact, it was widely encouraged by everyone I met and I was even asked if I wanted to have ‘Mongol babies’ (I do not.).

A great quote by Undarya Tumursukh encapsulates the dangers of extreme nationalism regarding a woman’s agency:

“Nationalisms turn the control of women, their bodies, and their sexuality into a matter of national importance by defining patriarchy as the core of national identity” (you can find her article here).

Mongolian Sinophobia uses reactionist fear to uphold a patriarchal tradition that limits a woman’s role to a reproductive function, and, due to the need for ethnic preservation, regulates who she can sleep with and defines whose children she bares.  No wonder all the pictures of Dayar Mongol are solely of young men!

I remember the first time while living with a nomadic herder family in Bayankhongor that the father of the family came up to his kids and grabbed his 2-year old son’s penis in a loving way.  He shook it, laughed and looked at me and went “mongol.. MONGOL!” as if to tell me that this boy’s member was the key to the continuation of the Mongolian nation.   I have seen this repeated in different families several times since.   This scene has taken on a completely new meaning for me.

“Well behaved women seldom make history” – Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

 

I know many of us have already seen this quote several times, but it is the most apt description of the ideas racing through my head before I leave for the countryside.  I am about to leave for my first phase of intense research and a recent comment I received has thrown up questions in my head regarding the role of an anthropologist in the field.

A few months ago while at university, I jumped at the opportunity to do my presentation on militant anthropology, because of its relevance to my life and how I approach the field.  ‘Militant Anthropology’ was a term coined by Nancy Scheper-Hughes, an anthropologist at Berkeley, regarding how she worked with people in impoverished situations.  She was a peace-core worker and later a researcher in the town of Bom-Jesus, Brazil, a sugar-plantation area with great economic disparities between the workers (whose children died at massive rates due to malnutrition) and the plantation owners.  As a peace-core worker, Scheper-Hughes worked with the locals to create a community center and start workers’ rights groups to get the local community electricity, better pay, literacy and healthcare.

When she went back years later to do research, however, she was plagued with the anthropological legacy of colonialism and ‘objective’ research.  Anthropological theory advances cultural relativism; the belief that every culture is unique, complex and equal to any other.  Anthropologists were to only observe the intricacies and not make judgment calls.

However, what do you do if those around you are suffering?  She didn’t know if she should help the people or just observe them, which caused anger amongst the locals: In reaction to her fears of being ‘colonial’ if she helped them, the locals told her that the local sugar plantation owners were the colonial ones, not she.  She was their friend and as such should try to help them.

So, in reaction, she picked up her activism where she has left of and coined the term ‘militant anthropology’.  As opposed to the anthropologist as a ‘spectator,’ someone who supposedly objectively watches and stays removed from the events happening around them, she advocated the anthropologist as ‘witness.’  She stated that anthropologists should be driven by an ethic responsibility that is pre-cultural, and that ignoring the pain and suffering of the people studied was to de facto become part of the power relations hurting them.

I find myself embarking on a situation that stirs up similar feelings.  The Steppes Without Borders NGO, who is helping me and wants me to go to the south Gobi, has partially asked me to go due to local mining activities.  Mining is pushing people off the land and poisoning the surrounding areas.  So, nomads who have lived there for generations can no longer utilize that land and are pushed into smaller and smaller segments.  And the women, who historically took the brunt of economic impact in nomadic families by sacrificing their share of food for the family, are hit hard.  With a poisoned land and a failing of historical traditions, the women are forced to resort to utilizing their bodies in order to support themselves.  Thus, I am going to the South Gobi, the only area in Mongolia were women were traditionally allowed to live on their own to see how this economic changes and the incoming companies are changing the experience of women in the Gobi.

I am not going to pretend that I am going there to be completely ‘objective.’  I know already before going from my research and through interviews that women are suffering greatly and I do not intend to keep my mouth shut about it.  Unfortunately, exactly that is the problem.  No body hears the voices of nomads; they do not speak English and every time they express themselves, their voices are drowned out in choruses of disapproval, claims as to the ‘benefit’ of economic development and media silence:

Case in point: Tsetsegee Munkhbayar, an environmental activist and former nomad, who resorted to shooting mining trucks last year after his years and years of activism continued to fall on deaf ears… and he is just one of many who share his feelings:

http://www.minegolia.com/?p=599 (this article is incredibly long, but you only need to read the beginning to learn about Tsetsegee’s story)

Furthermore, these hierarchical relations also affect me directly; I can’t ignore that fact that the rising violence towards foreigners is a result of the voicelessness and helplessness a lot of locals feel in face of the massive foreign companies and mining activites that are depleting the countries resources and not benefiting the locals.

So, to conclude: I am super excited to go to the Gobi, but also know it will be hard.  And I do not intend on sitting back and ‘objectively’ observing, but go, knowing fully well that those helping me go need my help, and are thus helping me in return.  I want to be their friend and comrade, not the removed, western, white person scribbling in the notebook in the corner.  Even if that means advocating some ‘uncomfortable’ truths.

 

<3  See you later!

 

If you happen to be German-speaking, you can hear me being interviewed on the Trans-Siberian railway on the 13th of June at 18:00, Berlin time.  The interview on BR (Bayerischer Runkfunk) is called “Aus einem weiten Land – eine russische Weltreise.”  Someone wanna record it for me?

The opinions in this blog reflect solely the personal opinions of the blogger and in no way represent the Fulbright Association, the Mongolian National University, the Free University Berlin, nor the Mongolian United States Embassy.

HELLO LOVELIES!!

And a lovely, snowy spring to you too! The snow on the yurts outside my window...

The weather forecast for today, this lovely fifth of May, is a balmy -1 degrees Celsius and the skies are opening up to deliver some springtime snow showers!  Tomorrow, it will be cold again, but next week the temperature will steadily rise up to 18 degrees (whhhat?).  One couldn’t tell from the snow-peaked mountains behind my house.  The weather here is incredibly temperamental and makes at least a 4 degree jump each day, so forget going outside without checking the weather forecast.  Makes you really appreciate a good day…

Anyway, I have been sick from the exhaustion (but fun exhaustion!) that seized me last week and unable to leave the house, so the snow hasn’t affected me terribly.  Not leaving the house really bites when you have lots of cool stuff to do, but I guess staying in and watching multiple 3-hour long movies about American suffragists (now I am an expert on Ida B. Wells, Alice Paul, Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, wow are those some inspiring women) isn’t the worst thing ever.

I promised a few weeks ago to write about one of the women’s groups I have been working with here and I finally have the time to do such (although I am writing this by candlelight due to lack of electricity, thank god for computers with 8 hours of battery life).  Last week, I had the good fortune to be the official photographer at a showing of the Vagina Monologues (a theater piece by Eve Ensler on female sexuality), put on by a group of women that call themselves “Young Women for Change” or directly translated from Mongolian, ”Young Women’s Club.” 

Since arriving, I have been talking to all manners of women, and have time and again asked about the concept of feminism.  I am routinely shocked, yet my curiosity is piqued, by the fact that the majority of women have no clue what feminism is.  Even women who participate in NGOs or have had Western exposure have only first heard this term recently, and I have only encountered a few women who would openly call themselves ‘feminist.’ 

Although, as an Anthropologist and a gender one at that, I am immensely aware of the ethnocentric potentials of feminism.  Feminism IS a Western concept, with both its second and third wave being started in the same country, the United States.  However, third wave feminism is by definition a globalization-centered concept that admits that women are not the same everywhere –there is no ‘THE woman”- and that different women experience different levels of discrimination, aka a white middle class American woman does not face the same trails a woman in Sudan does.

Thus, the unfamiliarity with the term ‘feminism’ amongst Mongolian women is not something that should really surprise me.  Yet, for a country where the majority of women are better educated than men AND are partially discriminated against due to this rise in education, I feel women hunger for a term that gives credence to their experiences.

Thus, it pleasantly surprised, but did not shock me, when I heard the story behind “Young Women for Change.”  In this dearth of a female Mongolian solidarity movement, a few women decided that they needed to start a club to empower young Mongolian women. 

So, a few months ago, my friend Zola and others decided to post a Facebook web page with a call for young women who wanted to get together, discuss women’s issues, read, and generally empower each other.  As the news spread around, young women found their way to this Facebook page, and the online club membership boomed.  Now within 6 months of idea-conception, over 150 young Mongolian women from all sorts of professional backgrounds are members of Young Women for Change. 

Since the formation of this web page a few months ago, about 30 to 40 women have regularly been meeting in one of the local NGOs each week, forming discussion nights, organizing protests, and planning projects.  And recently they decided, in line with the international V-day movement -a movement to earn money for NGOs working with female victims of domestic abuse and violence- to translate, become actors, and produce the Vagina Monologues in two languages.  So, these girls with a variety of professional backgrounds, from NGO work to law students to dentists, sat down with next to no theater experience, and started translating, organizing, and planning the first showing in Mongolia. 

Talk about DIY (do.it.yourself.) for you, and for those who don’t know what diy is, it is the ability to enact plans, projects, and movements in a self-relient, non-commercial way solely through personal drive and engagement (phew!)!  In other words, the girls had an idea, and without doubting their ability, they did it themselves!

They not only put together an amazing show in two languages, it was a hit in the Mongolian press and they amassed a lot of money for the local Center Against Domestic Violence. It was a smashing success.

So, a few weeks ago, the LGBT Centre (a Mongolian NGO) asked the girls if they could put on the show again, this time including the optional transgender monologue in the original Vagina Monologues script.  And the girls agreed, but the theater they had originally performed in, rejected the idea out of fear of becoming ‘the gay theater’ in Mongolia.  So, the girls scrambled for another venue, and within two weeks they organized, planned, and practiced an additionally showing of the Vagina Monologues; this time with the transgender scene.  It was the first showing of any transgender play or scene in Mongolia… ever.  

So, what is my role in all this?  Nothing really, except that I got to document all of it!!!  So, for a few days I got to let my inner photography goddess run wild and ran back and forth for hours taking pictures of the women (and men!).  And it was SO MUCH FUN!

So, posted are some pictures of the event.  And next week, I get to hold a presentation for the women on the Western feminist movement, since many women in the club would call themselves feminist, yet have not really been exposed to the history of feminism.  I am so glad I get to spread this information!!!

And next on the agenda for the girls: reading and translating introductory feminist texts into Mongolian.  The only feminist text available in Mongolian at the moment is Simone de Beauvoir’s “The Second Sex.”  It is dense and anyone who has read parts of it can attest to its difficulty; not the easiest “Introduction to the Women’s Movement” text.  Plus, it was probably translated from the first English translation, which was done by a Zoologist (really???).  Maybe that’s why no one has heard of feminism in Mongolia… 

Until next time! <3

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

For those who are interested in LGBT struggles worldwide, you might be interested to read about the two latest deaths here in Mongolia.  This was posted by the LGBT Centre, the first NGO of its kind in Mongolia, which has a lot of work ahead of it… Here the post:

2011/04/02 ULAANBAATAR: Two killings in as many months have shocked Mongolian LGBT community. A gay male of forty to fifty years of age who went by a nickname S. in the community, a dentist by profession who had a practice in Zuunkharaa town, Selenge province, was found brutally murdered sometime in January 2011. Although the murder took place over two and a half months ago, no definitive headway has been made in the case, and no reports of investigation have been made public.

Another member of the community, an HIV positive bisexual male E. of forty to forty five years of age, one of the founders of a community-based non-governmental organisation working for HIV positive people, went missing at the end of February 2011. According to the reports from the community, his mutilated body was found on 24 or 25 March 2011: his right hand was cut off and his body was burnt. Although it is obvious that these are hate crimes, police questioned only gay and bisexual males in the city in relation to the latest murder as the gay and bisexual males are immediately considered automatic suspects in such cases.  The OSCE definition of hate crime is clear: they are “criminal offences carried out against people or their property because of their real or perceived connection, attachment, affiliation, support or membership of a group. A group may be based upon characteristics such as real or perceived race, national or ethnic origin, religion, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or other similar factor”. Hate crimes are devastating in their effects since they instill terror and fear in the targeted community. Mongolia has no legal definition of hate crimes, nor are there anti-hate crime legislations.

To belong to a sexual minority in this country is very.tough. and there is a lot of hatred towards those that don’t fit into the stereotypical Mongolian male/female divide.  I am interested to see how this plays out, but so far (as stated in the post) those arrested and questioned as suspects have only been other gay males, as if to validate the general (and police) stigma against gay men and ignore the problem of hate crimes and homophobia.  more later.

If you want to learn about an amazing NGO, go here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.